Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Sheehan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1910No. S.F. No. 5124PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the ■sum of $1715.00, alleged to be the balance due and unpaid for work done and materials furnished by plaintiff for defendant in constructing a building at defendant’s special instance and request. After the plaintiff had introduced his evidence upon the trial the court, on motion of the defendant, ordered a nonsuit. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment thereupon rendéred. .

The plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to erect a building upon a lot belonging to the defendant for the sum of $3680. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wilmington Transportation Co. v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Sample v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wilson v. Alcatraz Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API