Williams v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco,-and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
— The plaintiff, being the owner of about twenty thousand acres of swamp and overflowed *291land near the mouth of the San Joaquin River, on the twenty-first day of March, 1877, entered into a written contract with the defendants “to agist and pasture” upon his land certain cattle belonging to defendants, for the term of one year from the date of the contract. The defendants on their part agreed “ to pasture on said land, at their own risk and cost for herding, etc., all the cattle it shall be capable of grazing, over and above the sheep hereinafter mentioned, and in no case less…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.