Legal Opinion
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1981No. Nos. 80-639 and 80-643PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The three critical issues in this case are whether the commission properly: (1) included C.G. & E.’s Zimmer Nuclear Unit No. 1 and its nuclear fuel core as CWIP; (2) calculated C.G. & E.’s tax accruals which were used as an offset to the allowance made for working capital; and (3) determined C.G. & E’s cost of common equity for rate of return purposes.
In resolving these issues, we are mindful of the fact that, pursuant to R. C. 4903.13, this court will not reverse an order of the commission unless it appears from the record that such order is unlawful or unreasonable. It should also be noted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Masury Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Application of Suburban Natural Gas Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.