Legal Opinion
Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1984No. 83-461PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
R.C. 4903.10 prescribes the procedure for a rehearing. It states in pertinent part:
“After any order has been made by the * * * commission, any party * * * may apply for a rehearing in respect to any matters determined in said proceeding. * * *
ti* * *
“Where such application for rehearing has been filed, the commission may grant and hold such rehearing on the matter specified in such application, if in its judgment sufficient reason therefor is made to appear. * * *”
A rehearing is limited, in the commission’s discretion, first, to matters determined in the earlier proceedings, and second, among…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Board of Commissioners v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- J.P. v. T.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001