Legal Opinion

Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1979No. 78-942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Celebrezzf., C. ,T.

The crux of appellant’s arguments is that it is entitled to the full $45,491,000 requested in its application for a rate increase. The objections to the commission’s order involve four general areas — the allowance for construction Avork in progress (CWIP), the overall rate of return and dollar annual return, an adjustment for the coal excise tax and the; standard for calculating an allowance for property taxes.

In assessing' the appellant’s objections, this court is ‘bound by. the statutory mandate of R. C.- 4903.13 that an order df the commission will'be overturned: only,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API