Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Celebrezzf., C. ,T.
The crux of appellant’s arguments is that it is entitled to the full $45,491,000 requested in its application for a rate increase. The objections to the commission’s order involve four general areas — the allowance for construction Avork in progress (CWIP), the overall rate of return and dollar annual return, an adjustment for the coal excise tax and the; standard for calculating an allowance for property taxes.
In assessing' the appellant’s objections, this court is ‘bound by. the statutory mandate of R. C.- 4903.13 that an order df the commission will'be overturned: only,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by12 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.