Legal Opinion

Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1979No. 78-849PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Ohio Utilities raises 14 propositions of law in this appeal, some of which involve discretionary decisions by the .Public Utilities Commissiou. For the sake of brevity, we .will limit our discussion to the five riiost significant issues. ... . '

*156L

■ Appellant first challenges the authority of the commission to proceed with the instant investigation as it did. In initiating this investigation, appellee based its authority on R. C. 4905.26, which states, in pertinent part:

“Upon complaint in writing against any public utility by any person, firm, or corporation, or upon the initiative or complaint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API