Legal Opinion
Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1982No. 82-288PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
Sections 114(a) and (b) of PURPA (Section 2624[a] and [b], Title 16, U.S. Code) provide:
“(a) Lower rates. — No provision of this chapter prohibits a State regulatory authority (with respect to an electric utility for which it has ratemaking authority) or a nonregulated electric utility from fixing, approving, or allowing to go into effect a rate for essential needs (as defined by the State regulatory authority or by the nonregulated electric utility, as the case may be) of residential electric consumers which is lower than a rate under the standard referred to in section 2621(d)(1) of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Cremean v. Public Utilities CommisionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In re Complaint of Harris Design Servs. v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Citywide Coalition for Utility Reform v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.