Legal Opinion
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1975No. Nos. 74-276, 74-272 and 74-156PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The appeal of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company will be considered first, followed by *406the appeals of the city of Cleveland and the Sierra Clnb. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company will be referred to as the Company, the city of Cleveland as the City, the Sierra Club, Inc., as Sierra, and the Public Utilities Commission as the Commission.
I A.
REQUIRED RETURN FOR EQUITY PORTION OF RATE BASE.
In its first argument, the Company contends that the Commission, in determining the rate of return, failed to follow the holding in Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1962), 173 Ohio St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Automobile MacHine Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Application of Hawaii Elec. Light Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. State Corporation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.