Legal Opinion

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1986No. 85-1021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal OCC challenges the PUCO’s determination of CEI’s cash working capital allowance.

The scope of this court’s review of PUCO’s orders is set forth in R.C. 4903.13 which states in pertinent part:

*215“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”

“Under the ‘unlawful or unreasonable’ standard, this court will not reverse or modify an order of the commission ‘where the record contains sufficient…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API