Legal Opinion

Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8688PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from an order, as amended, striking from the files of the superior court of the county of Riverside an order to show cause theretofore issued in the above-entitled action.

The action was instituted by the plaintiff, as assignee of the president of the defendant oil company, to recover on a claim against said company for salary and commissions alleged to be due and owing to the plaintiff’s assignor. Service was had upon the defendant company by leaving a copy of the complaint and summons with its vice-president. An attachment, duly and regularly issued out of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Yoder v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Whitehead v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ashton v. Dashaway Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API