A. G. Col Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, J., pro tem.
The matter which is here presented for determination by this court purports to be a petition for a writ of prohibition. Through some inadvertence, an order to show cause why an “alternative writ of prohibition should not issue” was served upon the respondents. In view of the fact, however, that throughout the hearing the understanding of both the petitioners and the respondents has been shown to have been that the proceeding be treated as final in its nature, such intention will receive recognition and indorsement by this tribunal. The salient facts relating to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.