State v. Kincaid
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful racketeering activity in violation of ORS 166.720(3), a section of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.720(3) provides, as relevant:
“It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated with, any enterprise to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity * * *.”
A “pattern of racketeering activity” means “engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering conduct” under circumstances defined in ORS 166.715(3). “Racketeering activity” is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RomigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. FairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.