Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1948PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

The defendant, Ralph Smith, was indicted, jointly with another person, for the criminal offense of having, by force, threats and intimidations, endeavored to coerce one Mike Rose, a person employed by another, from continuing and performing his work. The indictment charged that the defendants, in Linn County, Oregon,

“* * * acting together and each aiding, abetting and assisting the other, did * * * wilfully and unlawfully by force, threats and intimidations en-. deavor to prevent one Mike Rose from continuing and performing Ms work, he, the said Mike Rose, then and there being employed as a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. People v. BogdanoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. People v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API