Legal Opinion

State v. Fair

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1996No. 94-10-37301; CA A90430PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was one of 12 members of street gangs indicted, inter alia, for offenses under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.715 et seq. All defendants filed 16 demurrers to the indictment. The trial court denied the demurrers and, following a stipulated facts trial of defendant, he was convicted of one count of racketeering. Under his first assignment of error, defendant makes seven arguments that the trial court erred in denying his demurrer to the charge of racketeering. Because we agree with defendant that, on one ground, the court erred in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. RomigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. StoutOregon Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API