State v. Sanders
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.
The question is, in an indictment for burglary, must the state specify the crime it charges the defendant intended to commit when he allegedly unlawfully entered the building?
The indictment in this case charged that the defendant, "did * * * unlawfully * * * enter a building * * * with the intent to commit a crime therein * * *.” The defendant demurred on the ground the indictment was not definite and certain as required by ORS 135.630(6). No constitutional ground was urged at any stage of the proceeding. The demurrer was overruled, the defendant pleaded not guilty, was tried, convicted and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. RonchettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. TovreaOregon Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. IsraelHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MottaHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.