Legal Opinion

State v. Pollard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1995No. C920219CR; CA A77376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*540HASELTON, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for murder by abuse. ORS 163.115(1)(c). He argues that the trial court erred in denying his demurrer to the indictment and in denying his motion to suppress inculpatory statements he made during a police interview. Because defendant’s statements were improperly induced by implied promises of leniency, we conclude that those statements should have been suppressed. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On June 19, 1991, defendant was taking care of his six-month-old baby, Joshua, when the baby stopped breathing. After Joshua was rushed to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MendacinoOregon Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SpielerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. ComptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. Ruiz-PizaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API