Legal Opinion

State v. Charlesworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 1997No. 93-08-35550 93-08-35551, CA A83960 (Control) CA A83961PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants Charlesworth and Parks were indicted for racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, delivery of controlled substances, and conspiracy to deliver controlled substances. The state appeals various pretrial orders in favor of defendants. Charlesworth cross-assigns error to orders in favor of the state.

The indictment against defendants arose out of an investigation that began in 1989 into drug-trafficking activities by Charlesworth. As a result of that investigation, a federal grand jury indicted Charlesworth in December 1992 for money laundering in violation of 18 USC § 1956. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API