Legal Opinion

State v. Romig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1985No. 10-83-05673; CA A32379PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant was indicted for violation of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), ORS 166.715-166.735, and for the separate offenses of fraudulently obtaining a signature, ORS 165.042, and obtaining execution of documents by deception. ORS 165.102. Defendant demurred to the indictment on the grounds that: (1) RICO is unconstitutionally overbroad in that it reaches expression protected under Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution; (2) RICO is vague, in violation of Article 1, sections 20 and 21, of the Oregon Constitution; and (3) the indictment failed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. GarciasOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. FairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. StoutOregon Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API