Legal Opinion

Adams v. Cosby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint by Cosby against Adams for materials furnished and work done in building a house.

Answer: 1. General denial; 2. Special contract; 3. Special contract, asking judgment against Cosby; 4. Payment; 5. Set-off.

Replies were filed, and issues of fact joined. No question is raised upon the pleadings; they need not, therefore, be more particularly stated.

A trial by jury was had, general verdict for plaintiff, and special findings:

1. That the materials were furnished and work done according to the special contract, and to the acceptance of Adams and the architect.

2. That the architect did not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerstetter v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lomax v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. McKinney v. SpringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Wolcott v. YeagerIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Hoagland v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Branham v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API