Hoagland v. Moore
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Scott Circuit Court.—Indebitatus assumpsit for goods sold and delivered; a count on a quantum valebant; and one on an insimul computassent.' Moore was the plaintiff below, and Hóagland, Hall, and Ballard, were tbe defendants. Plea, non-assumpsit. Verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff. ‘
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
This case was referred to arbitrators who made an award, which was afterwards set aside'by the Circuit Court, but on what grounds does -.not áppear. The presumption is that the Circuit Court acted correctly; so that it is now too late to suggest .that this decision was erroneous, without showing in tbe record the grounds on which-that suggestion is made. . The plaintiff obtained a verdict for 60 dollars. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was refused and a bill of exceptions taken, in which the whole of the testimony is set forth; of which tbe following is the substance:—
Abraham Poor…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by18 opinions
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hosmer v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.