Legal Opinion

Robinson Machine Works v. Chandler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Erom the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

In this action, the first paragraph of the complaint, as originally filed,.was withdrawn. The case stands upon the second paragraph, which may be stated as follows

That Thomas E. Chandler and Franklin Taylor were and are partners, under the name of Chandler & Taylor; that the defendant was and is a corporation in the county of Wayne; that Jonas W. Teo and Francis W. Robinson were the agents of said corporation; that plaintiffs proposed to said agents, in writing, to furnish them with one of the plaintiffs’ Mulay saw-mills, with straight slides, on board the cars at Indianapolis, for the price…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Howard & Ryckman v. HoeyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago Railroad v. LansingIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Indianapolis v. Twin Lakes Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API