Legal Opinion

Wolcott v. Yeager

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1858PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from the Lagrange Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellant, upon a special contract, and also for work and labor. By the special contract set up, the plaintiffs agreed to chop, clear off, fence, and grub twenty acres of land, described in the contract. The ground was to be inclosed, and divided into two lots by running a fence through the middle, with a good fence ten rails high, provided there was suitable rail timber enough on the land to make the rails; but the plaintiffs were not to go off the land for rail timber. Any rail timber left, after making the fence, was *85to be made into rails and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lomax v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Koon v. GreenmanNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Pullman v. CorningNew York Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Garver v. DaubenspeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Vail v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Board of Commissioners v. NewlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API