Legal Opinion

Higham v. Vanosdol

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1885No. 11,501PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Benjamin F. Vanosdol brought his complaint in the court below against Thomas Higham, alleging therein that the defendant, on the 17th day of September, *1611882, well knowing that Clara Vanosdol was the plaintiff’s wife, unlawfully persuaded, procured and enticed her to leave his home and society, and after carrying her away, with intent to injure the plaintiff, wrongfully debauched and had carnal knowledge of her, without plaintiff’s consent, and that by the means above mentioned he had alienated her affections from plaintiff and deprived him of her society, etc., to his damage, etc.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hadley v. HeywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gilchrist v. BaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  4. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago Railroad v. LansingIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Lewis v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Woolery v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Kern v. BridwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API