Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Bailey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1846PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from the La Porte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

— Bailey sued Lomax, and another against whom process was returned “not found,” in covenant. The declaration alleges that, on, &c., it was mutually agreed between the parties, that the defendants should furnish the plaintiff with materials necessary for making and painting one hundred winnowing machines, on the plan of Lomax’s patent, and that the plaintiff should make and paint, in a neat aud workmanlike manner, on the plan of Lomax’s patent, one hundred of said machines, and deliver them to the defendants, so soon as three mechanics by reasonable labour could complete them; and that the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linningdale v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Sinard v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Canby v. IngersolIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Kerstetter v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. McKinney v. SpringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API