Legal Opinion

French v. Cunningham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1898No. 17,830PublishedCited by 59 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellees, as partners, against appellant, to recover on quantum meruit for professional services rendered appellant, and also to recover for money advanced by them for expenses in connection with such services. The court made a special finding of facts, and stated conclusions of law thereon in favor of appellees, and, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment against appellant. The only errors assigned, and not waived, are (1) that the court erred in its conclusions of law; (2) the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The only…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Elmore v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. M'Cormick v. MalinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  3. Kersey v. GartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Dickinson v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Croker v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API