Eisenmayer v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff, claiming under a decree of the probate court assigning to her the property in question under the provisions of section 1469 of the Code of Civil Procedure, brings this action to quiet her title against the defendant adversely claiming as a creditor of the estate of plaintiff’s deceased husband.
It is conceded that decedent, George F. Eisenmayer, plaintiff’s husband, died seised of title in fee to lot 13, block 15, of Montecito Park, in the county of Los Angeles, with the dwelling-house thereon occupied by himself and wife as the family residence.
The defendant, W. K. Thompson,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Fealey v. FealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Dungan v. Superior Court of Fresno Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Huron College v. YetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- McLaughlin v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.