Legal Opinion

Hammell v. Britton

California Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1941No. L. A. 17012PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, J. —

This action is one for equitable relief in which the plaintiff attacks and seeks to have set aside a judgment rendered against him by the Superior Court for Los Angeles County. Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint based on insufficiency, uncertainty, ambiguity, and unintelligibility having been sustained without leave to amend, judgment of dismissal of the action was entered from which plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleges in his amended complaint: That defendant John H. Britton is the administrator of the estate of Sophie Britton, who died in December, 1932, and is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API