Hanley v. Hanley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. P. Coeeey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an equitable action brought by the plaintiffs, as heirs of one Patrick Hanley, deceased, to vacate and set aside a certain decree of the superior court rendered in the administration of the estate of said Patrick Hanley, by which certain real property was set aside to the defendant Ellen Hanley, the widow of said deceased, as a homestead. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the court below, and judgment was rendered for the defendant; and from such judgment plaintiffs appealed.
*693The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the demurrer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lynch v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Horton v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hogan v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- De Soto Coal, Mining & Development Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.