Bancroft v. Bancroft
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of this action after an order sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint. The action was brought by the plaintiff to have set aside an interlocutory decree in the case of Bancroft v. Bancroft, ante, p. 352, [173 Pac. 582], upon the ground that such decree was procured by collusion between the parties to that action, who are also the parties to this one. The facts out of which this action arose as set forth in the complaint herein are as follows: The parties were married on or about October 30, 1901.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Fealey v. FealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Godfrey v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.