McLaughlin v. Security-First National Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff’s complaint having been tested by demurrer and found lacking, the demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and a judgment of dismissal entered. *604It is from this judgment that the plaintiff has appealed. We are of the opinion that the determination of the trial court was correct; the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
From the complaint we find that, plaintiff’s grandmother having provided in her will that $3,000 should be left in trust for him until he attained the age of thirty, that sum was in 1925 distributed to the defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Tracy v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Fealey v. FealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ringwalt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Heathman v. VantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.