Legal Opinion

Dungan v. Superior Court of Fresno Cty.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1906No. S.F. No. 4502PublishedCited by 28 opinions

PETITION fpr Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of Fresno County. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Carter P. Pomeroy, Hannah & Miller, H. T. Miller, and Frank H. Short, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court of Fresno County from taking any further proceedings in the matter of the settlement of the estate of Jane Davis, deceased. The petitioners are the public administrator of Tulare County and Mary G. Stone, the niece and next of kin of said deceased.

It is claimed that the superior court of Fresno County is without jurisdiction in the matter of said .estate, notwith standing which fact it is asserting jurisdiction, having entertained an application for letters of administration therein, made an order appointing R. D.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Barnes v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Estate of EstremCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API