Legal Opinion
Barnum v. Andrews
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Huron; Beach, J. Debt by Anna M. Barnum, for the use of John F. -Murphy, against John Andrews and others, on an appeal bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This case was tried before the court without a jury. No findings were requested or made. The assignments of error are:
“1. On the evidence given, the judgment should have been rendered for the defendants.
“2. On the evidence, the judgment should have been rendered in favor of the defendant Clark.
“3. The evidence did not warrant the judgment against the defendants.
“4. The court erred in refusing to permit the cause to be reopened and further evidence taken before the rendering of judgment.”
The case is ruled by Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440, and cases cited; Township of Gumming v. Schick, 94…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Township of Cumming v. SchickMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Rice v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908