Old Second National Bank v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Maxwell, J. Garnishment proceedings by the Old Second National Bank of Bay City against Charles S. Williams, as garnishee of David M. Estey and James H. Calkins. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
December 21, 1895, the plaintiff commenced suit in the Bay circuit court against David M. Estey and James H. Calkins, partners under the name of *565Estey & Calkins, and on the same date sued out a writ of garnishment against defendant Williams; alleging in the affidavit upon which the writ was issued that “Charles S. Williams, of Owosso, Mich., has property, money, goods, chattels, and effects in his hands and under his control belonging to the said David M. Estey and James H. Calkins, and each of them, and is indebted to them, and each of them.” Mr. Williams made disclosure in the case under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- La Crosse National Bank v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Bethel v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Puget Sound National Bank v. MatherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Martz v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Presnall v. Stockyards Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Moys v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Brocket Mercantile Co. v. LemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Kyte v. MacIvorMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.