Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 30, 1953No. Record 4171PublishedCited by 43 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, hereinafter referred to as the Authority, filed its petition in the court below to condemn a lot of land with the buildings thereon numbered 300-306 Brambleton avenue, in the city of Norfolk, owned by Robert W. Hunter and Emily Bowie Hunter, hereinafter called the condemnees, and occupied by a number of tenants. The petition alleged that the property was needed in order to carry out a slum clearance and redevelopment plan which had been duly approved by the Norfolk city council and authorized by the Housing Authorities Law, as embraced in Code, §§…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Matter of Murray v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Adams v. Housing Authority of City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API