Legal Opinion
Stockus v. Boston Housing Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 15, 1939PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The bill of complaint alleges that the plaintiffs Stockus own a parcel of land with a dwelling thereon in that portion of Boston known as South Boston, and that the plaintiff -Tautvaisa is the owner of a similar parcel in the same locality; that the defendants, comprising the Boston Housing Authority (established by § 26L of the housing authority law, §§ 26I-26II, inserted in G. L. [Ter. *508Ed.] c. 121, by St. 1938, c. 484), have adopted an order taking a certain tract of land, including the parcels owned by the plaintiffs, having determined that the tract constituted a substandard area as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hegeman Farms Corp. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Nortz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Leahy v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.