Legal Opinion

Adams v. Housing Authority of City of Daytona Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 12, 1952PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 So.2d 663 (1952)

ADAMS

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

August 12, 1952.

Rehearing Denied October 21, 1952.

Maurice F. Foster, De Land, for appellant.

W. Cecil Grant, John L. Graham and Hull, Landis, Graham & French, Daytona Beach, for Housing Authority of the City of Daytona Beach.

Wm. W. Judge, Daytona Beach, for City of Daytona Beach.

MATHEWS, Justice.

Acting under the authority of Chapter 23077, Acts of 1945, now Section 421.08 note, F.S.A. and amendments thereto, the appellees authorized and undertook a redevelopment project for the purpose…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. Town of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Spafford v. Brevard County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. County of BrevardSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API