Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Agency v. Hayes

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1954No. Civ. 15893PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent chairman of petitioner Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco * to execute certain loan and grant contracts with the United States of America.

Questions Presented

1. Have interveners the right to intervene ?

2. Constitutionality of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, pt. I, div. 24, §§ 33000-33954) † as applied to (1) slum clearance, (2) blighted area.

Record

Respondent demurred and in answer to the petition denied none of the facts set forth in the petition, but based his refusal to execute the contracts on…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API