Law Offices of Mathew Higbee v. Expungement Assistance Services
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.)1 (UCL) has been crafted to preclude the shakedown lawsuit—the “I get rich” lawsuit brought by a person who has had no business dealings with the proprietor being sued, but who has happened to notice that the hapless proprietor is out of compliance with a particular law. (Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn’s, LLC (2006) 39 Cal.4th 223, 228-229 [46 Cal.Rptr.3d 57, 138 P.3d 207].) The question before us is whether, in endeavoring to protect “mom and pop” operators from the devastation wreaked by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Fitbug Ltd. v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.