Legal Opinion

Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2011No. S171845PublishedCited by 778 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

This case arises from Kwikset Corporation’s (Kwikset) manufacturing of locksets it labeled as “Made in U.S.A.” James Benson brought suit under the unfair competition and false advertising laws to challenge the labels’ veracity. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Benson.

While the case was pending on appeal, the electorate enacted Proposition 64 (Gen. Elec. (Nov. 2, 2004)), which called into question Benson’s standing to challenge Kwikset’s country of origin representations. Benson then filed an amended complaint in which he alleged he purchased…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by778 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

773 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API