Legal Opinion
Fitbug Ltd. v. Fitbit, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 26, 2015No. Case No. 13-1418 SCPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court are two motions for summary judgment in this trademark infringement and unfair competition case. First, Plaintiff Fitbug Ltd. (“Fitbug”) seeks partial summary judgment on likelihood of confusion; Defendant Fitbit, Inc.’s (“Fitbit”) affirmative defense of laches; and Fitbit’s fifth and sixth counterclaims. ECF No. 47-3 (“Fitbug Mot.”). Second, Fitbit moves for summary judgment on two affirmative defenses: laches and acquiescence. ECF No. 50 (“Fitbit Mot.”). Both motions are fully briefed,1 and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. Cosmetic Warriors Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Bikila v. Vibram USA Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- EP HENRY CORPORATION v. CAMBRIDGE PAVERS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Eko Brands v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.