Legal Opinion
Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 2003No. S100136PublishedCited by 730 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
This case addresses what claims and remedies may be pursued by a plaintiff who alleges a lost business opportunity due to the unfair practices of a competitor. The Republic of Korea wished to purchase military equipment known as synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems and solicited competing bids from manufacturers, including Loral Corporation (Loral) and MacDonald, Dettwiler, and Associates Ltd. (MacDonald Dettwiler). Plaintiff Korea Supply Company (KSC) represented MacDonald Dettwiler in the negotiations for the contract and stood to receive a commission of over $30 million…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by730 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
725 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.