Legal Opinion
In Re Tobacco II Cases
California Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 2009No. S147345PublishedCited by 609 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Prior to the 2004 amendment of the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), by Proposition 64, “[ajctions for any relief [under the UCL could be] prosecuted ... by the Attorney General or any district attorney or by any county counsel . . . [or] by a city prosecutor . . . [or] by a city attorney ... or upon the complaint of any board, officer, person, corporation or association or by any person acting for the interests of itself, its members or the general public.” (Bus. & Prof. Code, former § 17204, as amended by Stats. 1993, ch. 926, § 2, p. 5198;…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by609 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kwan v. SanMedica InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
604 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.