Legal Opinion
Angioscore, Inc. v. Trireme Medical, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 9, 2014No. Case No.: 12-CV-3393 YGRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss certain claims in the Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 244 (“4AC”) of plaintiff AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 262 (“Motion”).) The Motion is fully briefed. (Dkt. Nos. 264 (“Opp’n”), 279 (“Reply”).) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b), the Court deems the Motion suitable for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deschepper v. Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. Fiber Research International, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Fatnani v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Ketayi v. Health Enrollment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Lee v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.