Legal Opinion
Merced Irrigation District v. Barclays Bank PLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 29, 2016No. 15-cv-4878 (VM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Merced Irrigation District (“Merced”) is a state-recognized irrigation district located in Merced, California. On behalf of itself and others similarly situated (the “Proposed Class”), Merced alleges federal antitrust violations against defendant Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”), a financial services corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom. Merced’s claims arise' out of an alleged unlawful conspiracy to manipulate daily index prices for electricity between November 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 (the “Class Period”)…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Iowa Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Sonterra Capital Master Fund v. Barclays Bank PlcDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- LLM Bar Exam, LLC v. Barbri, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Gordon v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.