Legal Opinion

United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 26, 1997No. Crim. Action 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In re First and Second Round Petitions of Hubei Provincial International Trust & Investment Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the United States’ motions to dismiss the First and Second Round Petitions of the Hubei Provincial International Trust & Investment Corporation (“Hubei”), which were filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(Z) (1994). 1 For the reasons stated below, the motions to dismiss will be granted.

Background

The facts surrounding BCCI’s collapse are well known in the financial and legal communities, but certain facts bear…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  2. United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. (PC) Hendrix v. GomezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PS) Coleman v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Vena v. Moore, Schulman & Moore, APCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API