United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal derives from the criminal prosecution of Dr. Lawrence Lavin for federal drug and tax offenses. As part of Lavin’s criminal sentence, the district court entered a forfeiture order encompassing all of his property derived from drug activity. Appellant WMOT Enterprises, Inc. (“WMOT”) thereafter petitioned the court under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6) to amend its forfeiture order. WMOT asserted that Lavin, together with one Mark Stewart, embezzled a large sum of money from the company, thus giving the company an interest in Lavin’s forfeited…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. MageeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
- United States v. BrouilletCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jackson C. O'dell, Iii, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy FotiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert E. Douglas, Jr., Noel Lussier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.