Legal Opinion

Vena v. Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 1, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00437Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 NICHOLAS A VENA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0437-W-BLM 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 15 v. MOTION TO AMEND [DOC. 25] 16 MOORE, SCHULMAN & MOORE, APC, et al. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 In this lawsuit, Plaintiff Nicholas Vena is suing his ex-wife’s attorneys in an 21 underlying marital dissolution case for allegedly violating his due-process right to a fair 22 and unbiased tribunal. Plaintiff now seeks leave to amend the Complaint to add David 23 Schulman, a named partner with Defendant Moore, Schulman &…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API