Legal Opinion
United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Plaintiff United States brings this civil forfeiture in rem action alleging that the defendant funds — approximately $61.3 million in three different banks — are the proceeds of a wire fraud and subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. §§ 983 and 984. Claimants Hikmat Shadman Logistics Services Co., Hikmat Shadman General Trading, LLC, Faizy Elham Brothers, Ltd., Everest Faizy Logistics Services, Hikmatullah Shadman, Najibullah, and Rohullah move under § 983(f) for immediate release of the seized funds and additional properties. The United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. All Funds in Account Nos. 747.034/278, 747.009/278, & 747.714/278 Banco Espanol De CreditoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Seizure of any & All Funds on Deposit in Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Vandelinde v. Priority Automotive Roanoke, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021