(PS) Coleman v. Coleman
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMONTHY ALLEN COLEMAN, No. 2:20-cv-00548-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MELISSA LEA COLEMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. On July 21, 2020, the court dismissed 18 plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. 19 The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the 20 action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.