Griffith v. Reddick
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Stanley A. Smith and Grant Jackson, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendants for the return of possession of an automobile truck, or for the sum of $1,334.31, the amount of lien claimed by defendants against the same in case a redelivery of the property cannot be had.
Alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings, and insufficiency of the findings to sustain the judgment, are the grounds of appeal.
Very little consideration is required in disposing of the sufficiency of the evidence and findings in support of defendant’s right to a redelivery of the property. It clearly appears that defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Berson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Burke v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoosier Cardinal Corp. v. BriziusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bunnell v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.